Re: Kerberos errors

From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 06/24/04

  • Next message: S. Pidgorny : "Re: vpn + outlook + ICMP"
    Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:40:42 -0700
    
    

    Let us assume your research is accurate, that the messages
    are unavoidable when you have 5 Kerberos-ignorant clients.
    Whether you can accomplish what you are after depends on
    what event messages you do have interest in seeing.
    In the GPOs linked to the Domain Controllers OU you can
    set the Auditing policies
    (Comp Config / Windows / Security / Local Policy / Audit Policy)
    at a fairly course grain, enabling/disabling recording of success
    or failure events. If you disable the auditing category that is
    causing the messages you want to avoid seeing, whether you
    will loose event messages of interest will depend on which
    category of audit messages and what sources of messages are
    involved.

    As far as a tool supplied with Windows to view the event logs
    with "negetive filtering", i.e. show all msgs except . . . , I do
    not believe you will find joy. You might want to look into the
    EventCombMT tool from MS, which allows you to define views
    into the event logs (from multiple machines, which might not
    apply in your case) and have these available for future use.
    For EventCombMT:
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&familyid=7af2e69c-91f3-4e63-8629-b999adde0b9e

    -- 
    Roger Abell
    Microsoft MVP (Windows Server System: Security)
    MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4)  MCDBA
    "Frank" <stratster68@IHATESPAMworldnet.att.net> wrote in message
    news:euZRowZWEHA.3024@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
    > small DC w2k, 10 clients, 5 xp pro, 5 w98se. I get many kerberos errorsin
    my
    > log files. No user, or any defining data? I have researched and found that
    > this is expected with down level clients. Is this true and can I filter
    > these out of the log without removing things I do want to see?
    > Thanks,
    > Frank L
    >
    >
    

  • Next message: S. Pidgorny : "Re: vpn + outlook + ICMP"