Re: where to put SQL Server ?
From: S. Pidgorny
Date: 05/28/04
- Next message: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Previous message: Roman B: "Re: Server 2003 and Mac OS X"
- In reply to: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Next in thread: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Reply: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:17 +1000
That was me who told so. Overhead won't be huge, as performance of SQL
Server will be lokely limiting factor, not the network-traffic - please
advise if you're expecting transactions that will return big datasets and
have very powerful SQL Server. I just don't like the idea of IPsec
communication across firewalls - that is pretty much like putting a
communication line that bypasses firewall and leaves traffic control to the
endpoints. And it is harder to implement than SSL encryption for TDS, yet
with the same goal - confidentiality.
-- Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- "Hernán Castelo" <hcastelo@cedi.frba.utn.edu.ar> wrote in message news:e1ZbXv#QEHA.1620@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > somebody in a newsgroup > seuggest me that ipsec is an "overkill" > and use ssl rather than it > > i don't believe i go to use ssl > but, > how much overhead take ipsec ? > > bye thanks >
- Next message: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Previous message: Roman B: "Re: Server 2003 and Mac OS X"
- In reply to: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Next in thread: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Reply: Hernán Castelo: "Re: where to put SQL Server ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|