Re: All patches, but still exploited
From: Greg (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 04/12/04
- Next message: DenoxiS: "Re: permission denied on overwriting files (2003)"
- Previous message: dln: "Re: Question Regarding Windows Security"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: All patches, but still exploited"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: All patches, but still exploited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:15:13 -0700
"Jeff Cochran" <jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com> wrote in message
news:4080ea0c.15206696@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Fix the browser how? The security settings are there by default to
> not run scripts, not run executables, not run ActiveX components, etc.
> If a user chooses to run them, and there are valid reasons where you
> may need to, such as on a trusted intranet, then how can a programming
> company fix a user's behavior? They tried by setting the system to be
> restrictive, but in your case that didn't help.
I had security at the default levels except for uninstalling the enhanced
security of Windows 2003. The same problem happened with Windows 2000 with
the default settings. Nothing to fix? How do you figure? If a user runs
an ActiveX component or something else they shouldn't that's one thing, but
to have something automatically run due to an exploit is another.
> I'm sure Microsoft is open to any suggestions on ways it could modify
> software to prevent users from injuring themselves. But the analogy
> is a little kid. You lock him in his room and he'll never get hit by
> a car, but he misses his Junior Prom. So you let him out and teach
> him not to get hit by a car, but one day he runs out in the street
> anyway. Maybe if software allowed you to run free until it thought
> you were about to do something stupid and then locked you in your
> room, but parents have had a thousand generations to solve that
> problem with no results.
>
Your analogy does not apply to this situation.
- Next message: DenoxiS: "Re: permission denied on overwriting files (2003)"
- Previous message: dln: "Re: Question Regarding Windows Security"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: All patches, but still exploited"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: All patches, but still exploited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|