Re: Cacls vs Xcacls
From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 03/13/04
- Next message: Do: "Can't resolve server names once I'm VPNed in"
- Previous message: tomppa: "Re: Administrator rights to folder"
- In reply to: AM: "Cacls vs Xcacls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:29:50 -0600
> What's the difference between the two?
Xcacls has more options but is not built-in. Even in Win2003
it is technically in the (included) Support Tools but in early versions
it was only on the Resource Kit (or MS downloads.)
Neither is complete; neither is the easiest (or safest) tool to use,
although I use them both frequently, mostly in batch jobs or quick
changes.
/e is your friend. <GRIN>
If you want the most complete control of permissions (ACL's) and
are a command line nut AND a masochist, then download SetACL.exe
from SourceForge -- it works but has the most Byzantine AND
Baroque set of switches ever invented. (It makes NetSh look like "Dir".)
BUT SetACL does almost everything you could wish with permissions.
Did I mention? /e is your friend. <GRIN>
-- Herb Martin
- Next message: Do: "Can't resolve server names once I'm VPNed in"
- Previous message: tomppa: "Re: Administrator rights to folder"
- In reply to: AM: "Cacls vs Xcacls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
