Re: Vista security...What Vista security?...



On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:14:01 -0700, PixelCraft
<PixelCraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Having had to buy a Windows machine for work, I am appalled at how Microsoft
can make billions and billions of dollars of profit and NOT include automatic
protection from viruses and the like.

Erhmmm... Windows Vista happens to be relatively secure as is - as
long as it's kept patched.

With a few exceptions, viruses and other kinds of malware don't show
up until the user starts doing something that deliberately let's it
in. I'd say that 98% of malware problems are user induced.

How expensive can it be to buy out Macfee and Norton and offer their
services for FREE?

NO THANKS. There's no reason to add even more crap to it.

After all, it is the c**p OS that makes it possible to
exploit its weaknesses and yet there is NO responsibility taken for it.

Feel free to use a different OS. For free.

Instead, there's a complex in your face Macfee service embedded in the OS
that costs extra. Just turning it off is a nightmare.

A McAfee service in embedded in windows? I doubt that.

It's a hidden cost of running Windows, whichever way you look at it because
JUST to run the OS safely, you need antivirus protection.

Not really. I'm doing fine without, as a matter of fact.

I feel as if I've bought a car for x dollars and then found you actually
need seatbelts to drive it safely -- BTW, here is a seatbelt manufacturer and
their subscriptions. Just so you don't forget to buy their seatblets and
monthly subscription and blame us if you get thrown out of a car when you
*start* it, we will remind you daily and we will split the service so you'll
be sh** scared to disable it or to uninstall it.

Hmmm...and they wonder why M$ has a bad reputation!

M$ happens to be a company which goal it is to make money. You have
the choice of choosing something else.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vista SP-1 screwed up all my audio
    ... It was Trojan.Brisv.A!inf Ok, so there may be more viruses, but why ... revert back to pre-SP-1 updates? ... Have you checked for the latest drivers for your hardware (not just ... Windows Vista SP1 is not one of those exceptions. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: Opening first email takes a while
    ... It was first marketed by Norton in an attempt to boost sales by making people think they would be safer, and even Norton says it is not necessary. ... Is my computer still protected against viruses if I disable Email Scanning? ... Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses that are distributed as email attachments. ... To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have the most recent virus definitions. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: Weird problems
    ... its picked up some viruses for me when downloading ... > Disable email scanning by your anti-virus application. ... > additional protection and even Symantec says it's not necessary: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: activate
    ... doesn't mean that all viruses need ... > connectivity. ... protection is questionable. ... the AV software, the extra boot-up time, becomes more of a liability ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • MySecurityCenter Antivirus 2006 7.1.501
    ... ever, and continues to provide protection, detection, and elimination ... of thousands of computer viruses, worms, and Trojan horse programs. ... File Quarantine - Allows users to isolate and review detected viruses, ... Real-time Scanning - Proactive protection stops viruses from entering ...
    (comp.software.shareware.announce)