Re: Looking for guide to securing W2K




"Brian Boyko" <brian.boyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eAYMcVgRHHA.412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mainly, I'm not too worried about intrusion, but I am worried about
viruses/malware/worms.


Your best defenses against those threats are to watch closely
what you run on the machine (do you need to use it for email,
for web browsing?) and using what account (can you use a
limited rights account for what you will be doing?).

For W2k I tend toward setting up IPsec to deny all network
traffic and then carefully add on allows for what purposes
the box exists (and, with W2k this is imperfect; one needs
to pull up the KBs on the default IPsec exemptions)

Roger

"B. Nice" <b__nice@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d3n3s2p0n8rs3a3p8609nkjvn6v86eqnaq@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:15:57 -0600, "Brian Boyko"
<brian.boyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello - I'm looking for a guide to securing Windows 2000 SP4 on an older
laptop.

http://www.ntsvcfg.de/ntsvcfg_eng.html

I like Windows XP but I'm really performance minded on hardware
that old, it's reached it's upgrade maximum, and as I'm going to be using
it
as a modified HTPC, I'm wondering if I can modify it so that it's roughly
as
secure as Windows XP SP2.

In general I don't consider a hardened and patched W2K less secure
than an XP machine. But since you are not very specific about what you
actually want to secure against it's not that easy to give good
advice.

BTW, what exactly do you mean by "modified HTPC"?

I've already done the basics - installed AV software and Ad-Aware,

I don't really consider that "the basics". You have installed some
semi-useful AV-software and some questionable anti-adware stuff. For
what reason? Are you planning to install adware? ;-)

Maybe it would be a good idea if you defined the threats you want to
guard against and then set up appropriate counter-meassures.

though I've yet to find a good firewall solution

Good software firewalls don't exist. And again - to guard against
what?

other than having it connect through a Belkin router.

Consider shutting down network services instead. The before mentioned
website has a nice script to help you.

Please reply to brian dot boyko at gmail dot nospam dot com and remove
the
nospam.

-- Brian



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Something we can all agree on
    ... He points out that when threats decline, ... the law and unaccountable also". ... not merely a "secure" code used for the bulk channel). ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Linux and security
    ... > time if you want a secure Linux box that you can actually do something ... > up with something no more secure than a Windows machine that can't do much ... say that system security is of no importance and that everybody should use ... better find a way to make the "dumb" users aware of the threats. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: [opensuse] Re: Who said Linux doesnot get Virus infections
    ... not claiming it's perfect, just far more secure, even for a newbie user. ... sure it's far more secure(first of all it's secure by ... claims that there are no threats for Linux, ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Lightweight Firewall?
    ... Spender wrote: ... secure against those threats" are two completely different things. ... text/plain ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Chinese for mercantilism?
    ... Can you elaborate? ... How does merchantilism guard against the ...
    (soc.culture.china)