Re: Windows 2000 folder, files security setting did not propagate correctly?
- From: "J.H" <jpthsd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:27:56 -0800
That's brilliant Roger, you are my man!! The second post that I used "cut &
paste"
not the copy.
I saw that when copying, the file was copied to location to be inheritted
the destination folder
permission setting
I saw that when cut & paste or moving file, the original permission setting
retained, and
adding up the permission setting onto the file by destination folder.
Thanks so much,
JPTH
"Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O90bP1iAHHA.4024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What you report for moving files may be correct behavior.destination
What you report in second post for copying should never happen.
The way things work is:
for copy: new copy should always have permissions as determined
only by the copy-to location
for move:
if between partitions behavior is same as for a copy
if within a single partition: explicit permissions of the moved are
retained, and (eventually) inherited permissions of the moved are
dropped and replaced with inherited permissions from the copy-to
location
I recommend always doing a copy and then remove the copied when
wanting to move within a partition. The default permissions due to a
move within a partition are both (usually) administratively meaningless
and also indeterminant for a period of time due to the unpredictable
delay in the replacement of the inherited permissions.
"J.H" <jpthsd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eW$vc7fAHHA.144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As my understanding that whatever the security setting in the
mefolder is,
it will be propagating to the files within that folder, please correct
theif
i am wrong!
In this case, whenever we copy files from a folder to another folder,
administratorsecurity
setting of files still have the security setting of previous folder's
instead of destination folder's.
Let say we copy 2 files (of course, we use domain admin/root
thatto perform the
test), there are chances that 1 of 2 files will be not getting the
security
setting of destination
folder.
I do not really know why it does this, but anyone can have the hint,
appreciate!!
J.H
"J.H" <jpthsd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OSZ7nrfAHHA.3396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi there,
I have 2 folders, A and B, C on Windows 2000/SP3 Domain controller
We have strange problem that when we move files:
1. 2 files from C to A, one file got security propagation of folder A,
another still has from C's
2. 2 files from C to B, the same result as above
3. 2 files from A to C, B, the same result as above
4. 2 files from B to A, C, the same result as above
Conclusion: it is very clear that security propagation is not working
correctly in this case,
any one has hints to fix this problem?
Folder A permission setting:
RMA group, Sales Group = Read & Execute
Administrator/Domain Admin/Administrators = Full
User1 = Modify
System = Full
Folder B Permission setting:
RMA group, Accounting group = Read/Execute
RMA group, Sales Group = Read & Execute
Administrator/Domain Admin/Administrators = Full
User1 = Modify
System = Full
Folder C Permission Setting:
RMA, Accounting, Sales = read/execute
Administrator/Domain Admin/Administrators = Full
User1 = Modify
System = Full
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Folder permissions
- Next by Date: Set ownership
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows 2000 folder, files security setting did not propagate correctly?
- Next by thread: Re: Remote system administration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|