We run a mixture of Win2k and Win2003 servers, with 2 legacy NT
systems. As a result, we have to tun Win2003 in "mixed mode". I know
one of the constraints of doing this is that you can't nest security
groups.
I have problems using security groups defined in Active Directory to
assign permissions to shares and/or folders. The permissions don't
appear to be applied correctly and I have to assign these directly to
the users. Is this related to running in mixed mode?
File Server Migration Tool ...BDC to a W2K3 member server in mixed mode AD. ... File share on the BDC had permissions applied using local ... Point is why didn't the FSMT flag this as an error? ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
Bug - File Server Migration Tool ...BDC to a W2K3 member server in mixed mode AD. ... File share on the BDC had permissions applied using local ... Point is why didn't the FSMT flag this as an error? ... (microsoft.public.windows.file_system)
Active Directory Domain Name ... We upgraded our NT 4.0 domain to Active Directory,... are currently running in mixed mode.... We have added some PCs to the domain, ... Will this ability to reference the domain ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: Security Groups for Users Not Updating ...BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx ... moving them in and out of security groups the users does ... group getting added to the users even after logging in and logging out. ... Could this be caused by the mixed mode or am I looking at another ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
exchange 5.5/2003 with mixed mode 2003 domain public folders ... I have recently completed some work for a potential customer,... At this stage the domain will be in mixed mode and will not ...support universal security groups.... They use distribution lists to secure public folders.... (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
