Re: User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:59:34 -0700
"Christopher Harrison" <SpamFactory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1160919066.915788.183240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gosh -- that's a hack-and-a-half... but it works! Thanks :)
Yes indeed, and you're welcome.
Be careful in planning as the hack's real pain comes when you
decide you need to change policy settigs, again, and again . . .
(PS - one can also deny full to Administrators on the directory
system32\GroupPolicy, but this is quite drastic and requires an
unset to edit with certainty of remembering to re-deny).
Roger
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
Outside of a domain, local policy has effect on all machine
local accounts equally. This is changing with the Vista release
(finally, after 6 years of being advised that this is needed)
You may find interest in (the painful to implement hack)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;293655
.
- References:
- User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- From: Christopher Harrison
- Re: User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- From: Christopher Harrison
- User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- Prev by Date: Re: User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- Next by Date: Windows Defender
- Previous by thread: Re: User Restictions on a Standalone Machine
- Next by thread: Windows Defender
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|