Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: "Will" <westes-usc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:37:25 -0700
"Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OLXcubEzGHA.4232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As I said to you before, I am waiting to see how much one does get to vary
the Longhorn core server install with later selected/added features. You
will
like changes in Longhorn for all server installs however in this regard.
I would even settle for a "fat" system where we could explicitly shut things
off, and where there was *DOCUMENTATION* about *all* of the potential side
effects of turning off various subsystems.
--
Will
.
- References:
- Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Will
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Joe Richards [MVP]
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Will
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Will
- Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Expanding on KB 244600?
- Prev by Date: Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- Next by Date: Re: MS06-040: Vulnerability in Server service could allow remote c
- Previous by thread: Re: Expanding on KB 244600?
- Next by thread: MS06-040: Vulnerability in Server service could allow remote code execution.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
