Re: Active Directory vs. Novell NDS (Workgroups vs. Domains)
- From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:11:10 -0700
Your effort might be more successful if you were to approach it
from the total cost point-of-view, specifically when including the
cost reductions from the MS (free and integrated) client deployment
capabilities, central management (admin, config control, monitoring),
software updating, etc. vs. total cost for those capabilities and the in
ways diverse skillset needed for them in other platforms.
"BASEL GHAZZAWI" <bghazzawi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OuLraDICGHA.3584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am trying to find educational materials (graphical presentation or
animation clip) to explain what a "Security Domain" is and how user
accounts, network resources and computer objects are handled under Microsoft
infrastructure as opposed to the currently used Novell NDS and eDirectory.
Managers of this company are interested in knowing why they should convert
to Microsoft infrastructure and I have to answer in the simplest and
shortest way possible, therefore an animated clip is the best I can think
of.
I recall watching a great animation clip while attending the MOC years ago
(1996) of Windows NT 4.0 which explained what are security domains, why user
and computer accounts are forced, and how authentication happens. An
animation of this type in addition to the advantages of Active Directory in
an animated clip would make a big difference in a long fought battle to
replace Novell NDS and stop plans to migrate to SUSE Linux and eDirectory.
--
Active Directory vs. Novell NDS (Workgroups vs. Domains)
--
Basel Ghazzawi
(416) 628-3673
bghazzawi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: access denied
- Next by Date: Re: FTP ?
- Previous by thread: Re: access denied
- Next by thread: Re: FTP ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|