Re: Default Shares
From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNoSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 10/24/05
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Users on 1 site cannot shutdown"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Manage User Privileges Programmatically"
- In reply to: nospam: "Default Shares"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Default Shares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:51:52 -0700
Default shares require admin authN for access.
MS networking/filesharing is usually limited to specific
machines, or the "intranet", or is not bound to interfaces.
Removing the shares breaks only some things for admins,
but most work without the admin shares. However, it is
an open question what is really gained by removing them.
(obviously I assume that admin accounts are controlled,
both by long strong passcodes and as to their appropriate
usage).
"nospam" <bluetooth995@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130160678.673165.62990@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi all,
>
> Any secure practices would recommend you to
> disable all the windows default shares -C$..Admin$
>
> Of course, this is going to create problem for the system
> administrator - this limit their ability to
> manage the system with WMI, remote access,etc...
>
> So, if the admininstrator is having a strong password
> does it somehow mitigate the risk of having default shares?
>
> I would normally think defense in depth - though admin with
> strong password, but shnd still disable default shares
>
> Any comments?
>
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Users on 1 site cannot shutdown"
- Previous message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: Manage User Privileges Programmatically"
- In reply to: nospam: "Default Shares"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Default Shares"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|