Re: Group security
From: Kelly T. (KellyT_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/21/05
- Previous message: Brad Baker: "Re: Authentication Auditing"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Group security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:57:02 -0700
I did some more testing - created a couple of test users, groups and a new
directory. Those all worked fine. Then, I stopped inheritance on one of my
problem folders (copying the permissions), applied the changes, reapplied
inheritance and permissions are working as expected. Thanks for your help!
Kelly
"Steven L Umbach" wrote:
> It sounds like the users security token does not have the correct group
> membership. Use whoami /groups to verify if it does or not. If not then it
> is possible that changes to the domain global group have not propagated to
> the domain controller used to authenticate the user. --- Steve
>
>
>
> "Kelly T." <KellyT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:82560828-D801-4FEF-AA58-377CB0C7B6E8@microsoft.com...
> > We leave the share permissions as the default of Everyone - Full Control
> > and
> > restrict access through the NTFS permissions. Also, we don't use the deny
> > permissions.
> >
> > Windows definitely is not giving the most permissive access if the user is
> > part of 2 named groups. It's giving the most restrictive access.
> >
> > "Steven L Umbach" wrote:
> >
> >> Actually Windows will grant a user the most permissive permission when
> >> they
> >> are a member of multiple groups for NTFS or share permissions. The
> >> exception
> >> is that when a user has deny access based on group membership this can
> >> trump
> >> any allow permissions. Also if both share and folder/NTFS permissions
> >> apply
> >> to a user then the most restrictive of those two permissions will prevail
> >> which is what you may be experiencing. In other works is a user has read
> >> permissions to a share and full control permissions to the folder via
> >> NTFS
> >> permissions the user will only have read/list/execute to the folder over
> >> the
> >> network because the share permissions are more restrictive than the NTFS
> >> permissions.
> >>
> >> When possible try to configure permissions without using deny keeping in
> >> mind that the lack of permission is an implicit deny. Also when you are
> >> configuring permissions be sure to logoff and logon again as the user if
> >> group membership was changed for that user to refresh the user's access
> >> token which contains the groups the user is a member of. The support tool
> >> whoami can show the current groups that a logged on user is a member of
> >> in
> >> the access token if you have any question on that. --- Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> "Kelly T." <Kelly T.@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:C362B077-2EF2-4EFB-B959-FB6DEE696B97@microsoft.com...
> >> > We have a file server (SRV1) that most of our data is on. The group
> >> > Everyone
> >> > has r/w access to most of the folders with inheritance turned on.
> >> > Currently,
> >> > named users have access to specific folders (SRV1\Data\IT) to grant
> >> > them
> >> > read/write access.
> >> >
> >> > We'd like to get away from granting access by named user and switch to
> >> > using
> >> > groups. The problem I'm running into is Windows grants the most
> >> > restrictive
> >> > policy when a user belongs to 2 groups. So, if Everyone has read
> >> > access
> >> > to
> >> > the IT folder, but the group IT should have read/write, the user ends
> >> > up
> >> > with
> >> > read only access.
> >> >
> >> > We'd like to make this transition transparent to our users, so taking
> >> > away
> >> > the Everyone group could be problematic. Are there any reports/tools
> >> > to
> >> > tell
> >> > which users have accessed certain folders or a way around this conflict
> >> > between the Everyone group and other named groups?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > Kelly
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
- Previous message: Brad Baker: "Re: Authentication Auditing"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Group security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|