Re: PKI. Why not standard edition
From: Brian Komar (bkomar_at_nospam.identit.ca)
Date: 08/25/05
- Next message: Brian Komar: "Re: EFS and Certificate Services"
- Previous message: Neil: "Re: Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution"
- In reply to: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Next in thread: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "Re: PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Reply: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "Re: PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:10:30 -0500
In article <1124914752.631885.295500@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
barabba72@hotmail.com says...
> It seems I need to use 2K3 Ent Ed in order to run an enteprise pki. Why
> is Std Ed not recommended ? I couldn't find any more details about
> this.
>
> Thank you
>
>
Here is the short list of what is only available in Enterprise Edition
(or Data Center)
- issue certificates based on version 2 certificate templates
- key escrow
- enforce role separation
- issue certificates to users using autoenrollment
Check out the PKI Best Practices whitepaper available at
www.microsoft.com/pki for more details.
Brian
-- == Brian Komar MVP - Windows - Security http://www.identit.ca/blogs/brian
- Next message: Brian Komar: "Re: EFS and Certificate Services"
- Previous message: Neil: "Re: Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution"
- In reply to: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Next in thread: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "Re: PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Reply: barabba72_at_hotmail.com: "Re: PKI. Why not standard edition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|