[FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for "SERVER"$ Error - Netd
From: NickN (NickN_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/08/05
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Difference between a USER and an AUTHENTICATED USER"
- Previous message: Bill Tkach: "Difference between a USER and an AUTHENTICATED USER"
- Next in thread: Steve Duff [MVP]: "Re: [FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for "SERVER"$ Error - Netd"
- Reply: Steve Duff [MVP]: "Re: [FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for "SERVER"$ Error - Netd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:19:07 -0700
I would seem to be suffering the exact opposite of KB article 870692. I have
prepared a new Windows 2000 member server in a Windows 2003 domain (reusing
an old 2000 licence) I am running through the checklist before I install
Exchange 2003 on this box & get the above error when running netdiag.
Microsoft acknowledges the problem in the KB article above when it is a 2003
member server in a 2000 domain. If checked the event viewer, turned on
security auditing & kerberos auditing to no avail. Tried klist ticket, klist
tgt etc. - doesn't seem to be an issue here. I've forced kerberos to use TCP
& not UDP. Not sure where to go next unless this is an artifact of the same
bug as mentioned in the KB article.
Does anyone have similar experience to mine? Any help gratefully accepted.
Nick.
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Difference between a USER and an AUTHENTICATED USER"
- Previous message: Bill Tkach: "Difference between a USER and an AUTHENTICATED USER"
- Next in thread: Steve Duff [MVP]: "Re: [FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for "SERVER"$ Error - Netd"
- Reply: Steve Duff [MVP]: "Re: [FATAL] Kerberos does not have a ticket for "SERVER"$ Error - Netd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
