Re: Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 07/07/05
- Next message: Pearl: "Group Policy"
- Previous message: segedunum: "Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- In reply to: segedunum: "Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Next in thread: segedunum: "Re: Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Reply: segedunum: "Re: Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 06:09:40 -0700
If your W2k3 is now at SP1, have you reviewed the SP1 release
note information, as it, like SP2 for XP, introduced new hardening
for RPC and DCOM. Now, you said COM+ but it sure sounded
like the users may be remote when attempting this, so . . .
-- Roger Abell Microsoft MVP (Windows Security) "segedunum" <segedunum.1rsupz@> wrote in message news:TLedncgfpIfTv1DfRVn_vg@giganews.com... > > Hi All, > > I've got a problem running COM+ components on Windows 2003 that I > haven't seen perviously. > > If I log into the client workstation as a domain administrator, I can > access the COM+ component absolutely fine. However, if I access it > logged in as an ordinary domain user I get a permission denied 70 > error. Otherwise, users can get access to the server fine and use > shares on it. I've been through all the motions for this. > > - The workstations and the server are a part of an Active Directory set > up and authenticate against it. > - I've created roles for domain users against my COM+ components to > ensure declarative security for them. > > In the event log I've got authentication sucesses for the domain users > from the workstations I'm using, so no failures there and nothing that > would indicate any kind of other failure. None of my COM+ components > implement programmatic security, or even have an Initialize routine. > They're very, very simple components. > > I've been through everything I can think of. The only remaining thing I > can think of is if a setting in AD is stopping access, but I have > absolutely no idea what that might be because it could be just about > anything. I think I've exhausted everything in Component Services, but > if anyone has any other ideas that would be great because I can't > believe I'm the only one to see an error 70 like this. > > Thanks a lot. > > > -- > segedunumPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access >
- Next message: Pearl: "Group Policy"
- Previous message: segedunum: "Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- In reply to: segedunum: "Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Next in thread: segedunum: "Re: Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Reply: segedunum: "Re: Permission Denied When Accessing COM+ Component as Plain Domain User on 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|