Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 07/01/05
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 07:46:05 -0700
It sure is starting to sound like a malware based inhibition
of registry tool access.
-- Roger "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message news:e%233zjHbfFHA.1412@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hmm. From what I can tell it looks like subinacl shows that administrators > have full control of HKLM. I am at a loss as why you can not edit it. I > always use regedt32 for Windows 2000 so you may want to try that if you have > not yet. If it was my computer I would not use subinacl until I had an image > backup. As far as Group Policy - registry you will not see that in Local > Group Policy but it should show in Domain Controller Security Policy if SBS > has such. If you can not get for antivirus to work try using the SysClean > utility from Trend Micro [see links below]. Just download Sysclean and the > pattern file [after unzipping] into a common folder to run from - no > installation is involved. --- Steve > > http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp > http://www.trendmicro.com/download/pattern.asp > > "Andy Roxburgh" <spamplease@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:usMh4EYfFHA.3904@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > > Hi Steven, > > > >> Make sure that you are logging on as the administrator account and not > > some > >> renamed administrator which is sometimes used as a domain account. The > >> command "net user administrator" will display group membership. > > > > I get (exactly as output) : > > .... > > Logon Script > > User Profile > > Home Directory > > Last logon 6/30/2005 2:00pm > > > > Logon Hours Allowed All > > > > Local Group Memberships > > *Account Operators > > *Administrators > > *Backup operators > > *Server Operators > > *Print Operators > > > > Global Group Memberships > > *Exchange Services > > *Domain Admins > > *Domain Users > > *Enterprise Admins > > *Exchange Domain Serve > > *Group Policy Creator > > *Backoffice Internet U > > *Scheme Admins > > > >>Also verify > >> that domain admins is a member of the administrators group for the domain > > as > >> it is possible for it to be removed. > > > > I checked this with the SBS Admin console and it appears to be OK. > > > >>You should also run a full malware scan > >> on your server being sure to use the latest definitions from your vendor. > > > > Just tried a full AV scan and it consistently locks up half way through - > > not a great sign! > > Just ran MS Antyspyware beta and it's clean; will try a different AV > > scanner > > and try again. > > > >> Also some "protection" packages can block access to the registry I am > > told. > >> You may want to boot into safe mode to see if that helps. > > > > Will try this at the weekend - the server's in use at the moment. > > > >>Subinacl is a tool > >> that can be used to view and change file and registry permissions at the > >> command line if need be. However it is very powerful and I would not use > > it > >> unless you have a full image type backup of your server or you are very > >> confident that you are using the right command possibly from trying it on > > a > >> test computer first. > > > > Thanks! Have used it to show the HKLM permissions. Typing > > subinacl /key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE /display > > I get : > > > > =========================== > > +KeyReg HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > > =========================== > > /control=0x0 > > /owner =builtin\administrators > > /primary group =system > > /audit ace count =0 > > /perm. ace count =4 > > > > /pace =system ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Full Control > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_SET_VALUE-0x2 > > KEY_CREATE_SUB_KEY-0x4 > > KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 KEY_CREATE_LINK-0x20 > > DELETE-0x10000 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 WRITE_DAC-0x40000 WRITE_OWNER-0x80000 > > > > /pace =builtin\administrators ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Full Control > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_SET_VALUE-0x2 > > KEY_CREATE_SUB_KEY-0x4 > > KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 KEY_CREATE_LINK-0x20 > > DELETE-0x10000 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 WRITE_DAC-0x40000 WRITE_OWNER-0x80000 > > > > /pace =everyone ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Read > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 > > > > /pace =restricted ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Read > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 > > > > > > > > and this compares to HKEY_USERS which I do have access to as follows: > > > > > > =================== > > +KeyReg HKEY_USERS > > =================== > > /control=0x0 > > /owner =builtin\administrators > > /primary group =system > > /audit ace count =0 > > /perm. ace count =4 > > > > /pace =system ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Full Control > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_SET_VALUE-0x2 > > KEY_CREATE_SUB_KEY-0x4 > > KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 KEY_CREATE_LINK-0x20 > > DELETE-0x10000 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 WRITE_DAC-0x40000 WRITE_OWNER-0x80000 > > > > /pace =builtin\administrators ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Full Control > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_SET_VALUE-0x2 > > KEY_CREATE_SUB_KEY-0x4 > > KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 KEY_CREATE_LINK-0x20 > > DELETE-0x10000 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 WRITE_DAC-0x40000 WRITE_OWNER-0x80000 > > > > /pace =everyone ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Read > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 > > > > /pace =restricted ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE-0x0 > > CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE-0x2 > > Key and SubKey - Type of Access: > > Read > > Detailed Access Flags : > > KEY_QUERY_VALUE-0x1 KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS-0x8 KEY_NOTIFY-0x10 > > READ_CONTROL-0x20000 > > > > To me it looks fine; but there's definitely something wrong somewhere > > because it won't show HKLM permissions etc from regedit! > > > > Do you think I should try > > > > subinacl /subkeyreg HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE /grant=administrators=f > > subinacl /subkeyreg HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE /grant=systems=f > > > > ? > > > > Ironically the reason I'm going through all this is so that I can create a > > ghost image - I'm using Veritas IDR and it's not playing ball. > > So I can't easily ghost the server before making changes. > > > >>Group Policy can also be used to manage registry > >> permissions via computer configuration/Windows settings/security > > settings - > >> registry though you need to be careful doing such and should unlink the > >> Group Policy when done and needs to be linked to the proper OU where the > >> computer accounts are. Improper use of file/registry permissions via > > Group > >> Policy can cause performance problems in the domain. --- Steve > > > > I don't appear to have the 'registry' item available under 'security > > settings'.... > > > > It's not looking good is it??! > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Admin / Domain Admin rights problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|