Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles
From: Kim Noer (kn_at_nospam.dk)
Date: 07/01/05
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: User Profile - Folder permissions"
- In reply to: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:09:13 +0200
"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:%23fUuS9efFHA.576@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
> As Steve suggests, before trying to fix Kerberos itself, check whether
> you need to fix its key dependencies of DNS and timesync (which can
> be off due to DNS).
I'll dig into the time sync issues, since a client expirences clock drift
currently, and apparently the client does not correct the time. I'll post again
when I've been digging around enough :).
Thank you very much for the information posted (both you and Steve), highly
appriciated.
-- I doubt, therefore I might be.
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: User Profile - Folder permissions"
- In reply to: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Kerberos' role in a 'std. setup' without bells & whistles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]