Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions
From: markmidwest (markmidwest_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/13/05
- Previous message: Peter Kaufman: "Opinions on AVG for Networks/Workstations"
- In reply to: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:41:01 -0700
Thank you for your reply.
I have been trying different combinations & think I found something I'm
doing wrong. The directory is D:\Users\Common; I have a share for Users &
another for Common. If I map directly to the share Common I have full
access. If I map a drive to the share Users & then navigate to Common I can
only Read; it's using the rights from the User share. Is it bad to have a
share within a share? My idea was to map S: to the Common share & then U: to
users. Maybe I need to change my directory scheme?
Thanks again.
"Roger Abell" wrote:
> It almost sounds like either the group used, Corporate, is new,
> or the user's membership in it is new, well, at least more recent
> than their last login.
> Group memberships for a login session are fixed at what exists
> for an account at the time when it logs in.
>
> --
> Roger Abell
> Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
> MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
> "markmidwest" <markmidwest@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:618B015F-679F-4564-9BA6-2494EBADFC4D@microsoft.com...
> > Windows 2003 Server (Standard)
> >
> > I have a share called COMMON & a security group called CORPORATE; I have
> > given corporate full security & permission to the common folder but users
> in
> > the corporate group are not able to put anything in common. If I give
> > individual users full security & permission it works fine.
> >
> > Is there a basic rule for permissions & groups (security & distribution)?
> I
> > had it setup the same on my Windows 2000 server & it was fine.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
- Previous message: Peter Kaufman: "Opinions on AVG for Networks/Workstations"
- In reply to: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Windows 2003 Security/Permissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|