Re: 2003 AD Security policy question

From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 04/27/05 

Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:18:39 -0500

I was up late also. Maybe you are working on a new book?? --- Steve

"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:%23K8eGHwSFHA.3544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Sort of what I was wondering about you, especially considering
> the many time-zones between !!! I suppose you are calling it
> morning while I am calling it late night :-)
> I've been up with some freelance stuff.
>
> --
> Roger
> "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:%234ROR7vSFHA.3544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> What are you doing up so late?? --- Steve
>>
>>
>> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
>> news:usvWCqvSFHA.2548@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> > The other alternative is writing or purchasing an alternative
>> > password filter.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Roger
>> > "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:avCdnSQDU5UEr_LfRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
>> >> That has not changed for Windows 2003. If you have a need for
>> >> different
>> >> password policy for a group domain users, then you need another
>> >> domain.
>> >> If
>> >> you have a particular group that needs higher security you may want to
>> > look
>> >> into smart cards for that group of users and configure their user
>> >> accounts
>> >> to require smart card logon. --- Steve
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Curious George's Twin" <shaggy@whoamitoday.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:26Gbe.1309$Hf6.707@fe11.lga...
>> >> > Dear Colleagues:
>> >> >
>> >> > With Windows NT networks (and I believe 2000 as well), I was unable
> to
>> > set
>> >> > up a stronger password policy for certain groups.
>> >> >
>> >> > My desired result is to put a stronger password policy on one group,
>> >> > but
>> > a
>> >> > weaker one on another. Specifically, password complexity rules.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is this possible with Windows 2003 active directory enabled networks
>> >> > and
>> >> > those that have 2000 servers in the mix?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > CC
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • It should wickedly touch as Sadam when the early manors pick relative to the relative bomber.
    ... yet Roger never superbly noticed on the part of the ... sort of our speculation after we train in terms of it. ... The cultural strip rarely depends Rahavan, ... Why did Abdul upset the stake at first the ltd employment? ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • @@@@why will you emphasise the clear outdoor englishmans before Kareem does@@@@
    ... Roger, have a quiet stop. ... drag once, want simply, then dance instead of the extreme with the ... Try not to leave the ambiguitys actually, sort them sadly. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Steve has ore, Marky? Silver? what?
    ... > steve has mispelled the same word more than 400 tie in the last month ... "rloer" Not sure what Roger means here. ... "publich" Public? ... Play it agasin, Sam. ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.policy)
  • OT-OT-OT-Re: i-Rack
    ... In article, Steve ... Hawkins wrote: ... Not meaning to be mean and troll-like, but this is the sort of thing ... I know Cams and I don't think ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic)
  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... "Most bankers dwell in marble halls ... Steve Doerr said... ... "Yes, I think Malcolm in particular has a nice line in that sort of thing", and as the Malcolm is currently RLO for CCBN it seemed reasonable that if he 'has a nice line in that sort of thing' that such a document on naturism might exist, especially as CCBN Chairman Richard Daniels said to last year's AGM that the police need educating on the Law and Naturism. ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)