Re: 2003 AD Security policy question

From: Curious George's Twin (shaggy_at_whoamitoday.net)
Date: 04/27/05

  • Next message: Dave Footer: "Only certificate corrupted [local pc] now unable to access encrypted network files" 
    Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:57:45 -0400

    Thanks Roger, its appreciated.

    I am sorry, but what do you mean by an alternative password filter? I dont
    know what that is.

    CC
    "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
    news:usvWCqvSFHA.2548@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    > The other alternative is writing or purchasing an alternative
    > password filter.
    >
    > --
    > Roger
    > "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net> wrote in message
    > news:avCdnSQDU5UEr_LfRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
    >> That has not changed for Windows 2003. If you have a need for different
    >> password policy for a group domain users, then you need another domain.
    >> If
    >> you have a particular group that needs higher security you may want to
    > look
    >> into smart cards for that group of users and configure their user
    >> accounts
    >> to require smart card logon. --- Steve
    >>
    >>
    >> "Curious George's Twin" <shaggy@whoamitoday.net> wrote in message
    >> news:26Gbe.1309$Hf6.707@fe11.lga...
    >> > Dear Colleagues:
    >> >
    >> > With Windows NT networks (and I believe 2000 as well), I was unable to
    > set
    >> > up a stronger password policy for certain groups.
    >> >
    >> > My desired result is to put a stronger password policy on one group,
    >> > but
    > a
    >> > weaker one on another. Specifically, password complexity rules.
    >> >
    >> > Is this possible with Windows 2003 active directory enabled networks
    >> > and
    >> > those that have 2000 servers in the mix?
    >> >
    >> > Thanks,
    >> >
    >> > CC
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

  • Next message: Dave Footer: "Only certificate corrupted [local pc] now unable to access encrypted network files"
    • Quantcast