Re: 2003 AD Security policy question

From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 04/27/05 

Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:22:57 -0700

Sort of what I was wondering about you, especially considering
the many time-zones between !!! I suppose you are calling it
morning while I am calling it late night :-)
I've been up with some freelance stuff. 

-- 
Roger
"Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message
news:%234ROR7vSFHA.3544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> What are you doing up so late??   --- Steve
>
>
> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> news:usvWCqvSFHA.2548@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > The other alternative is writing or purchasing an alternative
> > password filter.
> >
> > -- 
> > Roger
> > "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:avCdnSQDU5UEr_LfRVn-uQ@comcast.com...
> >> That has not changed for Windows 2003. If you have a need for different
> >> password policy for a group domain users, then you need another domain.
> >> If
> >> you have a particular group that needs higher security you may want to
> > look
> >> into smart cards for that group of users and configure their user
> >> accounts
> >> to require smart card logon.  --- Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> "Curious George's Twin" <shaggy@whoamitoday.net> wrote in message
> >> news:26Gbe.1309$Hf6.707@fe11.lga...
> >> > Dear Colleagues:
> >> >
> >> > With Windows NT networks (and I believe 2000 as well), I was unable
to
> > set
> >> > up a stronger password policy for certain groups.
> >> >
> >> > My desired result is to put a stronger password policy on one group,
> >> > but
> > a
> >> > weaker one on another.  Specifically, password complexity rules.
> >> >
> >> > Is this possible with Windows 2003 active directory enabled networks
> >> > and
> >> > those that have 2000 servers in the mix?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > CC
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>