Re: MS04-024 and MS04-037 supersedence question
From: Alice (Alice_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/21/05
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: IPSEC not blocking specific IP address per Ethereal"
- In reply to: GeeB: "Re: MS04-024 and MS04-037 supersedence question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:19:01 -0700
"GeeB" wrote:
> Yea, MS didn't do a good job of explaining the MS04-037 not superseding
> MS04-024. To be clearer, this note is specific to NT Terminal Server Edition
> only, not other platforms. Additionally, it depends if Active Desktop was or
> was not installed on NTSE (an option originally part of IE 4).
> Take a look at this very detailed list of patches and see if this helps:
>
> http://townsendonemedia.com/bulletInBlue/Downloads/mspatches.xls
>
>
> G
Thanks for the info and the link. Perhaps someone from Microsoft could
comment on why, if MS04-024 *is* superseded by MS04-037 for Windows 2000, the
security bulletin for MS04-037 doesn't mention MS04-024 at all in the FAQ
"What updates does this release replace?" section?
Alice
PS. HFNetChk and HFNetChkPro both flag MS04-024 as missing on W2K, but this
could be a mistake in the XML file.
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: IPSEC not blocking specific IP address per Ethereal"
- In reply to: GeeB: "Re: MS04-024 and MS04-037 supersedence question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]