Re: ISA Opinions
From: Robert Moir (robspamtrap+msnews_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Michael Bednarek: "Re: screen capture"
- Previous message: Miha Pihler [MVP]: "Re: TCP/IP Filtering Problem"
- In reply to: mwebb: "ISA Opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:04:08 +0100
mwebb wrote:
> I am working on a security specialty in my MCSE track. I just started
> studying ISA 2000.
>
> Microsoft's claims in the early chapters of the study kit are pretty
> impressive. But things are seldom as good as they first appear.
>
> What are the good points and not so good points about using ISA
> server? Is it better, worse or just different from a hardware
> firewall?
It is worth pointing out that *all* firewalls are "hardware firewalls" and
*all* firewalls are "software firewalls". Every firewall is a software
program running on a hardware platform. (I personally use the term 'software
firewall' to mean those childs toys people put on their home computer but
thats another story).
ISA server is a good firewall for protecting Windows based workstations
while allowing them easy access to facilities on the internet, that i'm
happy to deploy in combination with another dedicated firewall such as a
cisco pix or sonic wall or suchlike.
-- -- Rob Moir Website - http://www.robertmoir.co.uk Virtual PC 2004 FAQ - http://www.robertmoir.co.uk/win/VirtualPC2004FAQ.html Kazaa - Software update services for your Viruses and Spyware.
- Next message: Michael Bednarek: "Re: screen capture"
- Previous message: Miha Pihler [MVP]: "Re: TCP/IP Filtering Problem"
- In reply to: mwebb: "ISA Opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|