Re: Security policies are propagated with warning
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: mvanzwieten_at_gmail.com: "Re: Automatically Renewing User Certificates from Inhouse CA?"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: The Kerberos subsystem encountered a PAC verificat failure"
- In reply to: GVB: "Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Next in thread: GVB: "Re: Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Reply: GVB: "Re: Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:32:02 -0600
Going to http://www.Eventid.net and entering the source and Event ID number
often will be very helpful. Make sure that your dns is absolutely correct
for the domain for both domain controllers and domain computers per the
first link below. Also on domain controllers first run the netdiag and then
the dcdiag support tools. The will run a batty of tests and failed
tests/warnings/errors can help you pinpoint the problem. Gpotool and replmon
can also be very helpful. If any of your domain controllers are multihomed
or also a Remote Access server, that can often cause problems. --- Steve
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B291382 --- AD
dns FAQ
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321708 --- netdiag
and how to install support tools.
"GVB" <nospam@notever.no.no> wrote in message
news:XvE0e.6312$fT3.3210@fe02.lga...
> The following error is showing up in my event viewer:
> -------------
> Security policies are propagated with warning. 0x4b8 : An extended error
> has
> occurred.
>
> For best results in resolving this event, log on with a non-administrative
> account and search http://support.microsoft.com for "Troubleshooting Event
> 1202s".
> -------------
>
> This does not happen every five minutes, like the associated KB articles
> state. Instead, they are showing up about every three hours or so. I am
> also not using any XP computers in my environment, so the XP related
> solutions really shouldn't seem to apply.
>
> I attempted another suggested fix (on a test server), which was to
> analyize
> and rebuild the security database. This caused a large number of errors
> on
> the next reboot, hanging the server, and eventually forced me to rebuild
> the
> server... thus, I'm not going to attempt that on a production server.
>
> Other than the warnings, there does not appear to be anything adverse
> happing as a result of these errors. As a result, I'm uncertain if this
> should be a concern, or if attempting to fix it may result in more
> problems
> (which is what resulted on my test server).
>
> Suggestions / insight would be appreciated... thanks -
>
>
- Next message: mvanzwieten_at_gmail.com: "Re: Automatically Renewing User Certificates from Inhouse CA?"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: The Kerberos subsystem encountered a PAC verificat failure"
- In reply to: GVB: "Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Next in thread: GVB: "Re: Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Reply: GVB: "Re: Security policies are propagated with warning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
