Re: IPSEC
From: Kerodo (loopback_at_localhost.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: IPSEC"
- Previous message: Brian Komar: "Re: Using Certificates with IPSEC"
- In reply to: Steve Clark [MSFT]: "Re: IPSEC"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: IPSEC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:13:30 -0800
In article <ep37GzWBFHA.4008@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>, bogus@microsoft.com
says...
> More specific filter actions will win....
>
> Best practice is to use the Windows Firewall to provide that statefulness
> and use IPsec filters/IPsec transport to augment that and optionally provide
> per-packet authentication/encryption.
>
>
> "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:O5$nuuQBFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > Ok. Well that is fine. Ipsec is a good way to learn how to setup basic
> > firewall rules. It would not block traffic into your network with a source
> > port of 80 TCP because you need to allow the return traffic back into your
> > computer [via a mirrored filter entry] when you initiate an internet
> > connection to a website. Since ipsec is not stateful it will allow any
> > traffic in with a source port of 80 TCP. The block all IP rule would not
> > stop that traffic because an ipsec specific rule will override and ipsec
> > general rule such as block all IP [don't ask me the specific way in which
> > that is calculated as I don't know]. Anyhow your computer is in no grave
> > danger but ipsec filters act like old packet filter firewalls before
> > stateful packet inspection came along. --- Steve
> >
> >
> > "Kerodo" <loopback@localhost.com> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1c6334d1a52d583c989684@news.west.cox.net...
> >> In article <aeOdnZ5mBY-6DmTcRVn-sw@comcast.com>, n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-
> >> comcast.net says...
> >>> There is no way to do general logging with ipsec in Windows 2000. W2003
> >>> does
> >>> offer some logging such as for dropped packets. You would need to use a
> >>> software firewall such as Sygate to have some logging. Sygate is free
> >>> for
> >>> personal user, is a stateful firewall [unlike ipsec] , and has
> >>> extensive
> >>> logging capabilities. Ipsec is not meant to be a first line internet
> >>> firewall. One weakness of a packet filtering firewall is that due to the
> >>> rules it is possible for a user to scan your internal network by
> >>> manipulating the source port of the scan. For instance you may be
> >>> allowing
> >>> all traffic from port 80 to your computer from the internet. I could use
> >>> a
> >>> program such as Supercan 4 to scan your network by using port 80 as the
> >>> source port for my scan. A stateful firewall would not allow that. I
> >>> think
> >>> ipsec is great for what it is good at, particularly on the lan, but I
> >>> would
> >>> not use it as a permanent primary internet firewall. --- Steve
> >>
> >> Thanks Steven, that's helpful. I'm very familiar with all the firewalls
> >> out there today. I'm playing with ipsec mostly out of curiosity, to see
> >> if I could find something to use as a packet filter that's ultra lite on
> >> resources, mostly just for fun. Sounds like I'd be better off with
> >> something like CHX-I, which also has stateful inspection.
> >>
> >> If my ipsec rules only allow outbound traffic on remote port 80 (source:
> >> my address, destination: any address), then wouldn't ipsec block any
> >> incoming traffic from remote 80 if I also have a block all incoming rule
> >> in place? Or does ipsec not care about the direction of the traffic?
> >>
>
Thanks to both Steve's... I think I'm safer with stateful inspection.
At first I was misunderstanding things I think. I didn't realize that
allowing traffic out on 80 would also allow it back in if I want things
to work right. Thanks for the clarification and help.. :)
-- Kerodo
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: IPSEC"
- Previous message: Brian Komar: "Re: Using Certificates with IPSEC"
- In reply to: Steve Clark [MSFT]: "Re: IPSEC"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: IPSEC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|