Windows 2003 CA in W2K Domain

From: John (John_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/23/05


Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:19:03 -0800

Hi, I am planning a deployment of certificate services for a client
deployment. The client has a Windows 2000 domain but will migrate to 2003 at
some future (unplanned as yet) time. I am wondering at the benefits /
possibilities of deploying Windows 2003 certificate services in this
environment. Is this possible and to what degree the new features can be
utilised? I believe some features will require the forest schema to be
updated to 2003 but would appreciate any thoughts anyone has on the pros and
cons of using a 2003 CA in this environment (there will actually be 2 CAs - a
standalone root and a subordinate issuing Enterprise CA). Any thought /
experiences of pitfalls very welcome.
Thanks.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VB Express vs. ????
    ... AND your target audience is Windows OS based, then "click once" is they way ... the client PC. ... Since these are Windows forms apps you can ... deployment of applications and the web side will return to a more simple (as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: REPOST-MSOffice manipulation w/ WebPage or SmartClient?
    ... In a closed environment where everyone is using Windows and has the ... then a smart client is almost always a better solution ... then use a smart client using no-touch deployment. ... NTD will allow you to distribute a Windows Forms ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: REPOST-MSOffice manipulation w/ WebPage or SmartClient?
    ... In a closed environment where everyone is using Windows and has the ... then a smart client is almost always a better solution ... then use a smart client using no-touch deployment. ... NTD will allow you to distribute a Windows Forms ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Windows 2003 CA in W2K Domain
    ... I am planning a deployment of certificate services for a client ... > possibilities of deploying Windows 2003 certificate services in this ... The key is applying the Windows Server 2003 Schema. ... (subject to the client OS versions). ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Cobol work?
    ... >> deployment a month....I thought the same thing of his statement as I did ... hardware systems, not one single point of failure (that is redundant ... > meeting kicking off a Y2K project at another client that day. ... >> I also believe that the hardest bugs to find are the ones that create ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)