Re: privilege timeout

From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 12/31/04


Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 03:39:41 -0700


"Doug Frisk" <PublicNews@removeme.fazwak.com> wrote in message
news:Obv1Exo7EHA.1400@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> "Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
> news:uA9ZDTj7EHA.3504@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > In addition to both valid responses so far, I believe that
> > you should address with those specifying this requirement
> > that it is, although not totally useless, window-dressing of
> > sorts. The client machine security, and/or digital rights
> > contraints on the documents, should be addressed.
> > You can go through hoops trying to effect object of your
> > initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they
> > can copy all docs to which they have access onto their
> > desktop/laptop and then walk off leaving that client and
> > the sensitive docs available to those that walk past.
>
> Ohh, good thinking. Rights management: [
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/rightsmgmt/default.mspx
>

Hi Doug (long time since I was MCT. . .)

Right on, Digital rights management systems are a solution
currently in search for adoptors, but one which addresses
a very real set of needs not easily otherwise satisfied.

-- 
Roger Abell


Relevant Pages

  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... >> In addition to both valid responses so far, ... >> you should address with those specifying this requirement ... >> initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... >> the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... The client machine security, and/or digital rights ... > initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... > the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... The client machine security, and/or digital rights ... > initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... > the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)