Re: privilege timeout

From: Doug Frisk (PublicNews_at_removeme.fazwak.com)
Date: 12/30/04 

Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:26:07 -0600

"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:uA9ZDTj7EHA.3504@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> In addition to both valid responses so far, I believe that
> you should address with those specifying this requirement
> that it is, although not totally useless, window-dressing of
> sorts. The client machine security, and/or digital rights
> contraints on the documents, should be addressed.
> You can go through hoops trying to effect object of your
> initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they
> can copy all docs to which they have access onto their
> desktop/laptop and then walk off leaving that client and
> the sensitive docs available to those that walk past.

Ohh, good thinking. Rights management: [
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/rightsmgmt/default.mspx

Relevant Pages

  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... The client machine security, and/or digital rights ... > initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... > the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... >> In addition to both valid responses so far, ... >> you should address with those specifying this requirement ... >> initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... >> the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: privilege timeout
    ... >> In addition to both valid responses so far, ... >> you should address with those specifying this requirement ... >> initial posting but still have not addressed fact that they ... >> the sensitive docs available to those that walk past. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)