RE: spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches
From: Desmond Lee (mcp_at_donotspamplease.mars)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: permissions"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: NETWORK SERVICE, LOCAL SERVICE accounts"
- In reply to: gotenks: "spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Reply: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:39:01 -0800
If at all possible, do not make regular users members of the local
administrators group. This will help significantly in prevention, which
is always better than trying to fix.
"gotenks" wrote:
> spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches
> can SPAM and spyware/adware be prevented in a PC was all
> patched up with the most recent service pack and security
> patches from MS? Or does Spam alone bring Spyware/adware?
> We have been expiriencing many issues with adware/spyware
> on our PCs, i think its because 90% of our computers
> arent pacthed up with the most recent SP's and security
> patches. Im trying to convince management that we need a
> adware/spyware solution. If anyone has some good links on
> any of these questions,i sure would appreciated it.
>
> thank you
>
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: permissions"
- Previous message: Roger Abell: "Re: NETWORK SERVICE, LOCAL SERVICE accounts"
- In reply to: gotenks: "spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Reply: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: spam and adware-spyware and MS Patches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|