Re: Windows 2000 Certificate Services - Help Request (Understanding and operation).

From: Lisa_at_work (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/27/04


Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:48:30 -0700

Paul,

Do you have the link to the Microsoft PKI course?

Lisa

>-----Original Message-----
>In article <p18ui018mp9ru706ehdraloage8ku28hj4@4ax.com>,
in the
>microsoft.public.win2000.security news group, Go:gul
><b_ma_k@hotmail.com> says...
>
>> Question 1:
>>
>> As I understand it, I am supposed to do all my requests
on the
>> subordinate server and leave the CA root alone.
However, If I do this
>> then the CA Root server only ever shows (in the past 48
hours at
>> least), the certificates which were issued directly
from itself. It
>> does not show the certificates issued or revoked or
failed which were
>> produced as a result of requests from the subordinate
server.
>>
>> Should activity on the CA subordinate server not be
reflected in the
>> CA Root server (as it is the ultimate controller of
this system)?
>
>Nope. Each CA will only ever display the certificates
that it has
>issued. You're lacking a basic understanding of how PKI
works here. The
>root CA provides the top level of trust in your PKI, it
doesn't control
>the other CAs.
>
>>
>> Question 2:
>>
>> I have exported a certificate and imported it into
Outlook 2002. It
>> (Outlook) is capable of sending signed messages and
recognising signed
>> messages sent from a different account as signed.
>>
>> It fails completely with any attempt to encrypt a
message and send it
>> to a user account which has already sent a signed
message. I get a
>> warning that there is a problem with the other persons
certificate and
>> that it is not trusted.
>
>Based on which template? Are you sure that you've got a
certificate that
>is good for both signing and encryption?
>
>>
>> Question 3:
>>
>> There are alot of options for what type of encryption I
want when I
>> request a certificate. Can someone tell me what the
best all round
>> secure setting is when requesting a certificate through
the "request
>> form"?
>
>This is a big topic, and you really need to start with
the basics. PKI,
>given its importance and nature, is not something you can
get "almost"
>right and expect it to work, or to be secure. I'd suggest
taking a
>course in PKI (Microsoft has a great one), or at the very
least reading
>the help files, and the white papers, etc, on the
Microsoft web site.
>
>
>--
>Paul Adare
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no
>rights.
>.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: WPA and Microsoft PKI considerations in a NT4 Domain environment
    ... > Is it possible to implement a domain member Microsoft Windows Server ... > Microsoft PKI before we upgrade to a 2003 Active Directory Domain? ... Keep in mind that how you configure your certificates in Certificate ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Re-issue Certificates (quick question)
    ... I haven't requested a new certificate yet but I'm sure it will work. ... devices new certificate requests to already generated certificates. ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Proposal for a new PKI model (At least I hope its new)
    ... > Then the world would have no problem trusting your domain level PKI ... coined the term "certificate manufacturing" to distinquish from actual ... it turns out that one of the reasons for the SSL server domain name ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: New Method for Authenticated Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
    ... one of the motivating factors for the SSL domain name server ... server certificate, ... Was: PKI International Consortium ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: GPG
    ... http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm8.htm#softpki19 DNSSEC ... http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#53 TTPs & AADS Was: First Data Unit Says It's Untangling Authentication ... http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#67 Does Diffie-Hellman schema belong to Public Key schema family? ... http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004p.html#60 Single User: Password or Certificate ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)