Re: windows mapped drives
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: File Permissions solution"
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Critical Updates - Are they necessary on clients behind firewall ???"
- In reply to: ksouth: "windows mapped drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:22:06 GMT
There are always risks, though they can be minimized which it sounds like you have
done to a large part. Make sure that you are also using complex passwords for access
to the server as weak passwords are still one of the biggest threats to security.
Also keep in mind that the data you access over the mapped share may not be encrypted
on the wire. Ipsec in tunnel mode using certificates for authentication may be one
solution to that if it is an issue. --- Steve
"ksouth" <ksouth@doit.in.gov> wrote in message
news:22f4201c45de1$e62ead60$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> Hello. I have question concerning windows mapped drives.
> I have a setup that involves a privately addressed,
> internal windows host (10.x.x.x) mapping a drive to a
> windows server that resides off of a less-secure (but not
> the Internet) interface on a six-port firewall. Barring
> that the server is hardened and updated and the ACLs in
> the firewall allow the connection from the internal host
> to the server (stateful firewall) and not vice versa, are
> we opening up any risks in the direction from the server
> to the internal host because of the mapped drive? Thanks.
>
> - K
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: File Permissions solution"
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Critical Updates - Are they necessary on clients behind firewall ???"
- In reply to: ksouth: "windows mapped drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
