Re: 80 and 88
From: Svejk (svejkmb-mail_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: sancho: "sam file."
- Previous message: bluesky: "RE: Windows 2000 hangs after the latest April SEcurity updates"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Jun 2004 03:45:53 -0700
"Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message news:<Vravc.38862$Ly.20537@attbi_s01>...
> Port 88 is for kerberos while 80 TCP is for http website.
If a Windows 2000 Server is a domain controller, then it is running
Active Directory, right?
If it is running Active Directory, then is kerberos *required*?
Does the question below make sense then?
Thanks,
Svejk
> "Svejk" <svejkmb-mail@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:42c83856.0406010943.6b4fc526@posting.google.com...
snip
> >
> > "Discuss how an intruder using ONLY the TCP/80 and TCP/88 ports can
> > break into a Windows 2000 Server that is functioning as a domain
> > controller. Assume that the Windows 2000 Server is not making use
> > of IP-Sec or Kerberos."
- Next message: sancho: "sam file."
- Previous message: bluesky: "RE: Windows 2000 hangs after the latest April SEcurity updates"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: 80 and 88"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|