Re: Windows 2000 users accounts get locked out

anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com
Date: 05/28/04


Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:57:53 -0700

Hey Steve

Really appreciated your help. I have done a self scan from
skygate..but the result was all my ports were blocked
except smtp and ping. Anyway, thanks for helping.

>-----Original Message-----
>Hi Merrick.
>
>I think I mentioned testing your firewall initially and a
self scan at
>Sygate should have warned you about that. Having
netbios/file and print
>sharing ports open to the internet can certainly cause
such a problem. Glad
>you got it fixed! --- Steve
>
>
>"Merrick" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:11eda01c44235$0531b4a0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
>> Hey Steve
>> After going through the nightmares, and I found i got a
>> simple problem which most of us have ignored the
warning!
>> Just block the 135,137,139 and 445 and all my problems
are
>> gone!
>> Regards
>> Merrick
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Hi Steve,
>> >
>> >I really appreciated your patience and help. After
weeks
>> >of trouble shooting, I think I am zooming down to the
>> >source. Yes, it looks like a trojan that came into my
>> >servers or our users PC.
>> >I managed to stablised the condition by cleaning each
>> >individual PC and it seems to be helping for now.
>> >Will check out the links and will strengthen the
>> >protection as suggested. You have been a great help!
>> >
>> >Will update you once i have managed to control the
>> >situation. !!
>> >Regards
>> >Merrick
>> >>-----Original Message-----
>> >>Hi Merrick.
>> >>
>> >>Typically that sounds like an outside the network
attack
>> >from attackers that
>> >>were able to enumerate your users via file and print
>> >sharing ports somewhere
>> >>along the line. You say it does not happen when the
>> users
>> >go home. If they
>> >>shut down their machines either the machine causing
the
>> >attack is shut down
>> >>or the machine being attacked is shut down. One thing
>> you
>> >might want to
>> >>consider is the possibility a machine on your network
>> has
>> >a backdoor into
>> >>your network via a trojan or remote control software
>> >which may not be
>> >>detected by virus scan software and would require a
>> >program dedicated to
>> >>finding trojans such as those in the links below. I am
>> >surprised that you
>> >>are not finding any Event ID 529 or 681 if auditng of
>> >failed logon events is
>> >>enabled on all computers. You also may want to look
into
>> >debug logging of
>> >>netlogon as described a while back. Ideally you also
>> >want your perimiter
>> >>firewall configured with a default block all outbound
>> >rule and then create
>> >>exceptions for the authorized oubound traffic
[53/80/443
>> >and such] which can
>> >>help prevent successful remote control attacks ---
Steve
>> >>
>> >>http://swatit.org/download.html
>> >>http://www.pestpatrol.com/PestPatrolSBE/
>> >>
>> >>"Merrick" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in
>> >message
>> >>news:10b6e01c44090$88e31bf0$a001280a@phx.gbl...
>> >>> Hi Steve
>> >>> Those machine names I mentioned are not in my
network.
>> I
>> >>> have no idea why my users which are valid and the
>> >network
>> >>> domain name which is also valid were locked out from
>> >funny
>> >>> machine names! I have tried to capture 529 and 681
but
>> >my
>> >>> eventcomb did not managed to find any of those
errors.
>> >>> As for my firewall, I have tried to scan them from
>> >outside
>> >>> and my ports are blocked.
>> >>> One thing for sure is when all my users are gone for
>> the
>> >>> day, no more locked out happen. But once they are
back
>> >for
>> >>> work, the locked out happens again. Apparently the
>> >locked
>> >>> out issues were not someone trying to come in from
>> >beyond
>> >>> my firewall.
>> >>> I am still trying to figure out where the locked out
>> >>> happen. Thanks for the help though!
>> >>>
>> >>> have a great weekend!
>> >>>
>> >>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >>> >Hi Merrick.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >You say that those machines are on your network or
>> >not??
>> >>> Can you ping those machines
>> >>> >by their name and get a response? The caller
machine
>> is
>> >>> the name of the machine that
>> >>> >the user was attempting to logon from at the time
of
>> >the
>> >>> lockout. If those computers
>> >>> >are on your network, you need to find out why they
are
>> >>> trying to logon as your users,
>> >>> >such as a virus infection. If they are not from
your
>> >>> network then how are they
>> >>> >getting access? You said your firewall is
configured
>> >>> correctly? Is your firewall
>> >>> >allowing any access from the internet such as a web
>> >site,
>> >>> vpn, or Terminal Services?
>> >>> >The event ID displays what user is locked out and
from
>> >>> what machine but if you can
>> >>> >find any failures for logons on any domain machine
>> such
>> >>> as 681 or 529, that would be
>> >>> >helpful as it will help determine what domain
>> computers
>> >>> are being targeted for these
>> >>> >failed logon attempts and then you could use a
packet
>> >>> sniffer such as Ethereal to
>> >>> >monitor the traffic from the machine causing the
>> >lockout
>> >>> to possibly help determine
>> >>> >what is going on.. --- Steve
>> >>> >
>> >>> >"Merrick" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote
>> >in
>> >>> message
>> >>> >news:1021301c43f28$407ea5a0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> >>> >> Hi Steve and serverguy
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Great help!
>> >>> >> Yes i did a netdiag and seems ok but dcdiag
>> generated
>> >>> some
>> >>> >> errors: one of which: "[warning] The DNS host
>> >name 'xxx'
>> >>> >> valid only on Windows 2000 DNS servers.
[DNS_ERROR-
>> >NON-
>> >>> >> RFC_NAME], [WARNING] Cannot find a primary
>> >>> authoriatative
>> >>> >> DNS server for the name 'xxxx' may not be
>> registered
>> >in
>> >>> >> DNS"
>> >>> >> Managed to read up some issues and rerun dcdiag
and
>> >>> >> cleared all the erros. Still my accounts get
locked
>> >out.
>> >>> >> The worst is my event log from eventcomp shows
that
>> >my
>> >>> >> valid users are being locked out by all sorts of
>> >foreign
>> >>> >> manchine name, one of which is this:
>> >>> >> 644,AUDIT SUCCESS,Security,Fri May 21 16:06:46
>> >2004,NT
>> >>> >> AUTHORITY\SYSTEM,User Account Locked Out:
Target
>> >>> >> Account Name: "valid user id" Target Account
>> ID:
>> >%
>> >>> >> ("numbers") Caller Machine Name: ANGEL
>> Caller
>> >>> User
>> >>> >> Name: "my servername"$
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The Caller Machine Name: Angel is a remote
machine
>> >name
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> my network. I have no idea what is that! A few
>> others
>> >>> >> Caller Machine Name are PROXYSRV, GNSERVER,
>> >>> SERVIDOR ..??
>> >>> >> what are those!?. Am trying to scan all my users
for
>> >>> virus
>> >>> >> now.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thanks for helping !
>> >>> >> Regards
>> >>> >> Liew
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >>> >> >Event ID 642 will be recorded with every Event
ID
>> >644 -
>> >>> -
>> >>> >> that is normal. If you want
>> >>> >> >to modify password/lockout policy you have to do
>> it
>> >at
>> >>> >> the domain level which would
>> >>> >> >be "Domain Security Policy" in a default
>> >installation -
>> >>> >> it will NOT work if you do it
>> >>> >> >in Domain Controller Security Policy.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >Have you found any failed logon event ID's on
any
>> >>> domain
>> >>> >> computer? That is the place
>> >>> >> >to start to track down the problem to see if you
>> >have
>> >>> an
>> >>> >> infected machine or what.
>> >>> >> >The error for ,***StartServiceW Failed!***
would
>> >only
>> >>> be
>> >>> >> pertinent if you found that
>> >>> >> >on a computer experiencing account lockouts AND
the
>> >>> >> lockout time corresponded to the
>> >>> >> >time for that event in the alockout.dll log.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >Have you had a chance to run netdiag and dcdiag
on
>> >the
>> >>> >> domain controller and netdiag
>> >>> >> >on a domain client? If so did the results look
>> good
>> >or
>> >>> >> were there any reported
>> >>> >> >problems? --- Steve
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >"Merrick" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> >wrote
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> message
>> >>> >> >news:eed101c43d78$7eb1fc20$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> >>> >> >> Hi Steve,
>> >>> >> >> You have been a great help! I really
appreciated
>> >it.
>> >>> As
>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> >> my problem:
>> >>> >> >> 1.) I have disabled my accounts lockout policy
>> in
>> >my
>> >>> >> >> domain contoller security policy but i still
get
>> >>> >> accounts
>> >>> >> >> locked out, yes the administrator is always
>> locked
>> >>> out.
>> >>> >> >> 2.) I have included 644 and 642 in my
eventcomb
>> >and
>> >>> for
>> >>> >> >> every 644 i got one 642. MS provide very
little
>> >>> >> >> information on 642 and am still trying to
gather
>> >>> >> >> information on that. it seems like my secure
>> >channel
>> >>> is
>> >>> >> >> leaking.
>> >>> >> >> 3.) I have also planted alockout.dll in one
of my
>> >>> >> clients
>> >>> >> >> and one particular line is worrying me:
>> >>> >> C:\WINNT\system32
>> >>> >> >> \svchost,***StartServiceW Failed!*** (0),
>> Service:
>> >>> >> >> Service: Background Intelligent Transfer
Service
>> >>> >> >> (C:\WINNT\System32\svchost.exe -k BITSgroup),
RC
>> >was:
>> >>> >> >> Incorrect function. (1), GLE was: Overlapped
>> I/O
>> >>> >> >> operation is in progress. (997): Any
comment?
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Hope you can help! Many Thanks in advance!
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >>> >> >> >Hi again Merrick.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >If you have not done such, set your account
>> >lockout
>> >>> >> >> threshhold for number of
>> >>> >> >> >bad attempts to at least ten. You should be
>> >seeing
>> >>> >> failed
>> >>> >> >> logon attempts
>> >>> >> >> >such as Event ID 529 on some computers in the
>> >>> domain.
>> >>> >> >> These failed logons
>> >>> >> >> >could be on any computer in the domain - not
>> just
>> >>> >> domain
>> >>> >> >> controllers. Be
>> >>> >> >> >sure you have auditing of "logon events" for
>> >failure
>> >>> >> >> which is different than
>> >>> >> >> >account logon events enabled in Domain
Security
>> >>> Policy
>> >>> >> >> and Domain Controller
>> >>> >> >> >Security Policy. You may also need to
configure
>> >it
>> >>> at
>> >>> >> the
>> >>> >> >> OU level if you
>> >>> >> >> >are using Organizational Units with their own
>> >Group
>> >>> >> >> Policies that have
>> >>> >> >> >auditing disabled. You can check the Local
>> >Security
>> >>> >> >> Policy of any domain
>> >>> >> >> >computer and look at the "effective" settings
>> for
>> >>> >> >> auditing to see if it is
>> >>> >> >> >enabled. Those failed logon events will give
a
>> >lot
>> >>> of
>> >>> >> >> helpful info on why
>> >>> >> >> >the logons are failing and from what
computers
>> >the
>> >>> >> logon
>> >>> >> >> attempts are coming
>> >>> >> >> >from.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >In addition I would run some diagnostics on
the
>> >>> domain
>> >>> >> >> controller and then a
>> >>> >> >> >couple domain computers. First run netdiag on
>> the
>> >>> >> domain
>> >>> >> >> controller looking
>> >>> >> >> >for any failed tests/errors/warnings
>> >particularly
>> >>> >> >> relating to dns, domain
>> >>> >> >> >membership, and dclist. Then run dcdiag on
the
>> >>> domain
>> >>> >> >> controller looking for
>> >>> >> >> >failed tests again. After that do the same
with
>> >>> netdiag
>> >>> >> >> on one of the domain
>> >>> >> >> >members. On the domain controller and domain
>> >member
>> >>> >> run "
>> >>> >> >> netdiag
>> >>> >> >> >/test:ipsec " which will show if an ipsec
>> policy
>> >is
>> >>> >> >> assigned that can cause
>> >>> >> >> >problems in a domain. You can post results
here
>> >in a
>> >>> >> >> reply if any problems
>> >>> >> >> >are found. Those tools are found on the
install
>> >>> cdrom
>> >>> >> in
>> >>> >> >> the support/tools
>> >>> >> >> >folder where you will need to run the setup
>> >>> there. --
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >> Steve
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >"Merrick"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> >>> wrote
>> >>> >> in
>> >>> >> >> message
>> >>> >> >> >news:e7fb01c43cb0$4343bd40
$a001280a@phx.gbl...
>> >>> >> >> >> Hi guys! thanks for the help. I have scan
my
>> >>> >> firewall as
>> >>> >> >> >> suggested by Steven and all my ports are
>> >secured.
>> >>> I
>> >>> >> have
>> >>> >> >> >> also increase my password threashold to 10
>> >>> minutes. I
>> >>> >> >> have
>> >>> >> >> >> patched all my software for my servers and
>> >users.
>> >>> >> All my
>> >>> >> >> >> users are using Windows 2000 only. I have
also
>> >>> >> rename my
>> >>> >> >> >> administrator for my server. I have
downloaded
>> >>> >> >> EventCombMT
>> >>> >> >> >> from MS and managed to search all my events
>> >log. I
>> >>> >> have
>> >>> >> >> a
>> >>> >> >> >> long list of event ID: 644. Yet when i go
>> >through
>> >>> the
>> >>> >> >> list
>> >>> >> >> >> I still don't understand why my users are
>> >getting
>> >>> >> locked
>> >>> >> >> >> out! This happened suddenly and I have
never
>> >>> changed
>> >>> >> any
>> >>> >> >> >> thing to my servers. My accounts is still
>> >getting
>> >>> >> locked
>> >>> >> >> >> out and yet I still dont know why! Please
>> help.
>> >>> Many
>> >>> >> >> >> thanks in advance!
>> >>> >> >> >> Merrick
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >.
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >.
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>.
>> >>
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Interfacing to parallel port dongle via USB adapter
    ... But newer computers, particularly laptops, do not have these legacy ... ports and instead use USB to Parallel converters. ... I also don't buy Intel, I buy AMD. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Interfacing to parallel port dongle via USB adapter
    ... But newer computers, particularly laptops, do not have these legacy ... ports and instead use USB to Parallel converters. ... I also don't buy Intel, I buy AMD. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Interfacing to parallel port dongle via USB adapter
    ... But newer computers, particularly laptops, do not have these legacy ... ports and instead use USB to Parallel converters. ... The bridge chips on main boards almost all support LPT. ... The bridge chip supports LPT and all other legacy stuff but they took LPT out of the layout. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Interfacing to parallel port dongle via USB adapter
    ... But newer computers, particularly laptops, do not have these legacy ... ports and instead use USB to Parallel converters. ... The usual solution is to obtain a USB dongle from the software ... The bridge chips on main boards almost all support LPT. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: 192.168.x.x oddities
    ... RFC 1918 IP addresses from my network? ... ISP could ping your internal computers, then you might worry (unless you are ... They likely have a private and public IP bound to your cable ... has no open ports to help identify it. ...
    (Security-Basics)