Re: IPSec Vs Firewall software
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 03/09/04
- Next message: Tim: "Re: Virus tranmission via Windows Automatic Updates?"
- Previous message: Tim: "Re: Virus tranmission via Windows Automatic Updates?"
- In reply to: Calvin Lai: "IPSec Vs Firewall software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:09:28 GMT
I have used ipsec to work in a similar situation though I think you are better off
with a firewall. Start with a mirrored block all IP rule, add a mirrored permit all
rule for the subnet if you are on one, add a mirrored permit rule with a filter
containing the allowed outbound traffic such as 80 tcp, 443 tcp, 53 udp [dns], etc.
You might first want to check your filter so that it is allowing inbound traffic from
any IP and FROM port 80 tcp to any port on your computer. --- Steve
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1559
"Calvin Lai" <clai[at]qdata[dot]com> wrote in message
news:%23vpgr7eBEHA.2628@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
>
> At the beginning I thought I could implement a firewall using IPSec provided
> w/ Win2k Server. However, I have at least one scenario that can't be
> implemented using IPSec that could be achieved thru firewall software.
>
> Here is the problem:
> I want to block all inbound IP request on every port except 80 and perhaps
> 21. On the other hand, I want my local network to access internet freely. As
> a reuslt, a very naive approach would be to set up:
> a. Create an IP filter to filter all TCP from ANY IP to MY IP, NO mirror,
> and set this to Block
> b. Create an IP filter to filter all TCP from ANY IP to MY IP, NO mirror,
> port 80/21, and set this to Permit
> to your per
> however, this leads to a very serious problem. Whenever my client within the
> network trying to fetch anything from outside, e.g. a web page. they IP
> request can pass thru the policy (since there is no restriction on
> outbound). But when the data comes back to the server, they are blocked
> because of the first rule.
>
> I coulnd't think of anyway how this could be fixed using IPSec. Does anyone
> know if this is one of the constraints of using IPSec as "firewall"? Thanks
> for all inputs here.
>
> Calvin
>
>
- Next message: Tim: "Re: Virus tranmission via Windows Automatic Updates?"
- Previous message: Tim: "Re: Virus tranmission via Windows Automatic Updates?"
- In reply to: Calvin Lai: "IPSec Vs Firewall software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|