Re: File Auditing confusion
From: Steven L Umbach (sumbach_at_nospam-ameritech.net)
Date: 03/04/04
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: what security setting do I need?"
- Previous message: TDM: "File Auditing confusion"
- In reply to: TDM: "File Auditing confusion"
- Next in thread: TDM: "Re: File Auditing confusion"
- Reply: TDM: "Re: File Auditing confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 23:11:58 GMT
That is pretty much how auditing of folders/files works. You will get a LOT
of events. Try to audit the bare minimum of folders for bare minimum of
permissions from bare number of users - avoid auditing the everyone/users
group. If you want to see if an unathorized user is trying to delete a
folder for instance, just audit permission to delete instead of every
permission. If you want to see who has accessed a folder, just audit read,
etc. You still will have a lot of events, though you can use filter view or
dunp to a spreadshett for further analysis. --- Steve
"TDM" <tdm3@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1078354689.130026@cswreg.cos.agilent.com...
>
> I am completely confused on setting file auditing. I hope this does not
> get too verbose. Logistics, Win2K Pro, SP4, all security updates applied
via
> windows update. Member of WORKGROUP, no domain account.
>
> After googling till I am blue in the face, I came to the conclusion that
> in order to audit file access, one needs to enable Object Access auditing
> so I did. No problems here. I then enabled file auditing on /temp for
> testing purposes, did some stuff in /temp and then looked at the security
> log. Sure enough, the auditing was there, but so what a ton of other
useless
> banter about basically access to EVERY object on the system, be it a DLL,
> a .EXE, you name it, it was there. To put it in more detail, just the
simple
> creation of a folder in /temp created a whopping 1.2MB log file. At this
> rate,
> the log file will fill up very fast, much faster than I would like. Then
> turn back
> on real time virus protection and the log file goes bonkers with object
> accesses
> from snortin Norton. I set the file size to 256MB and at this rate, I
think
> it will
> fill up daily.
>
> From what I read on google, I was under the impression that you HAD to
> enable Object Access auditing to get file auditing which appears to be the
> case from testing, but I dont want all the other useless information. Have
I
> missed something
> here, done something wrong ?? I simply want to audit file access on
specific
> folders and forget all the other auditing. Any and all help is greatly
> appreciated.
>
> TIA
>
> TDM
>
>
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: what security setting do I need?"
- Previous message: TDM: "File Auditing confusion"
- In reply to: TDM: "File Auditing confusion"
- Next in thread: TDM: "Re: File Auditing confusion"
- Reply: TDM: "Re: File Auditing confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|