Re: TCP Connection - Established
From: Steven L Umbach (sumbach_at_nospam-ameritech.net)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: browsing"
- In reply to: John: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:56:28 GMT
Hi John.
Excellent and thanks for posting back. Now you know how to track these
issues down. Sygate has a lot of neat features, especially with it's logging
cpability. Glad to help. --- Steve
"John" <john@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1a858b8964a6ce14989684@news.telusplanet.net...
> In article <c7ESb.147041$5V2.785271@attbi_s53>, n9rou@n0spam-comcast.net
> says...
> > Port 1525 tcp is shown as used by Oracle applications in some port
charts.
> > Downloading and using TCPView from SysInternals will help by mapping
ports to
> The mystery is solved. I used Internet explorer to try to connect to
> 207.33.111.82. That failed, but it triggered a popup from my firewall
> advising that this address was trying to make contact with ntoskrnl on
> my machine, and did I want to allow the connection.
>
> Since the mystery connection had *never* left any tracks in my firewall
> log (which would allow me to back trace it) I said "yes" to the firewall
> in order to leave a backtraceable track in the firewall traffic log.
>
> No need to backtrace - the address shows in the traffic log as
> "ssupdates.sygate.com". The connection is used to determine if my
> firewall is up to date, version and patch wise. The firewall doesn't
> report the connection to reduce the "noise factor" I guess.
>
> I'm happy again. Thanks again for your help on the issue, and a general
> thank you for your input to this board.
>
> John.
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: browsing"
- In reply to: John: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|