Re: TCP Connection - Established
From: John (john_at_somewhere.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: browsing"
- Previous message: Oli Restorick [MVP]: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- In reply to: Steven Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:50:40 GMT
In article <c7ESb.147041$5V2.785271@attbi_s53>, n9rou@n0spam-comcast.net
says...
> Port 1525 tcp is shown as used by Oracle applications in some port charts.
> Downloading and using TCPView from SysInternals will help by mapping ports to
> process/application and right clinking the process will give more information.
> If you have not done a spyware/parasite scan you may also want to do that as it
> could be spyware. SpyBot Search and Destroy in advanced mode/tools also will
> show processes and startup applications that may also shed some light on what
> the mystery port usage is. I believe Sygate may even be able to map ports to
> processes and has a traceback function via the logs. It definitely looks like a
> connection to an external address because of the address 207.33.111.82. ---
> Steve
>
> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/tcpview.shtml
> http://www.safer-networking.org/
>
Steve,
The mystery is solved. I used Internet explorer to try to connect to
207.33.111.82. That failed, but it triggered a popup from my firewall
advising that this address was trying to make contact with ntoskrnl on
my machine, and did I want to allow the connection.
Since the mystery connection had *never* left any tracks in my firewall
log (which would allow me to back trace it) I said "yes" to the firewall
in order to leave a backtraceable track in the firewall traffic log.
No need to backtrace - the address shows in the traffic log as
"ssupdates.sygate.com". The connection is used to determine if my
firewall is up to date, version and patch wise. The firewall doesn't
report the connection to reduce the "noise factor" I guess.
I'm happy again. Thanks again for your help on the issue, and a general
thank you for your input to this board.
John.
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: browsing"
- Previous message: Oli Restorick [MVP]: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- In reply to: Steven Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: TCP Connection - Established"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|