Re: NAT Security
From: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp (levinson_k_at_despammed.com)
Date: 01/01/04
- Next message: Nataraj R: "Works properly in XP but not in 2K"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Network:"
- Maybe in reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: NAT Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 08:09:53 -0500
Note that NAT does NOTHING to protect the ports on the Windows server doing
the NAT. That server is wide open and waiting to be hacked or infected.
What you are seeing in your port scans are the ports on the server itself.
And once someone hacks your server, they can access your internal network.
There's also zero capability for logging, so if you're hacked or your
network connection starts getting slow due to bandwidth use, you've got no
idea who hacked you.
NAT on a hardened device such as a firewall or NAT router is somewhat more
secure than NAT on a Windows 2000 router connected directly to the Internet.
There are free firewalls out there, including www.kerio.com, www.sygate.com,
and linux firewalls [some of which may be easier to use than you think]
http://securityadmin.info/faq.asp#firewall
"Todd" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BEE8A9B3-7613-4B21-A17B-E26D71A4F8D1@microsoft.com...
> Thanks for that I will be looking into Firewalls but it was just a
quiestion to see how secure it would be... Looking at the port scan again it
looks to be very insecure I have also ports 21, 389, 80, 110, 119, 135, 139,
143, 443, 548, 993, 995, 3389 open , I dont have anything enabled on the
External Card but do host a web site, dns, pop, smtp, and terminals
services, how easy would it be for someone to hack the system ?
> I do realise that a Firewall is the ideal solution, but just about
anything is hackable if they want !!
> Is there any way i can close some of the unwanted ports thru fliters etc
in NAT ???
> Thanks,
> Todd
- Next message: Nataraj R: "Works properly in XP but not in 2K"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Network:"
- Maybe in reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: NAT Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|