NAT Security
From: Todd (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/31/03
- Previous message: Curtis Koenig [MSFT]: "RE: floplock.exe does not seem to work on W2K"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:16:16 -0800
I have a Win2K box used as a router / gateway to the internet which also hosts my exchange server, this is enabled with RRAS with NAT ? How secure is this ? When I do a port scan it seems quite secure with only a few ports open. eg 25 , 3387, 110 etc and a few more how can I block say 139 Netbios port .... is NAT just dependent on the services running on that box ? And how secure is this solution ?
- Previous message: Curtis Koenig [MSFT]: "RE: floplock.exe does not seem to work on W2K"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: NAT Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]