Re: Permissions Question
From: Steven L Umbach (sumbach55_at_ameritech.net)
Date: 11/06/03
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: I E Hijack"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Permissions Question OOPS!"
- In reply to: Vj: "Permissions Question"
- Next in thread: Kurt: "Re: Permissions Question OOPS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:15:11 GMT
Keep in mind than an explicit allow will override an inherited deny, and it
is possible to configure permissions that way where the inherited deny box
will be checked and grayed and you can still check allow. --- Steve
"Vj" <vijayrathee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0a9701c3a437$f4085850$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> Hey Kurt,
>
> Yes, you are on the right track. When there is a conflict
> between the NTFS permissions then the "least restrictive"
> permissions take effect. But since Deny is an exception to
> the rule, It overrides any other permission. So in case
> you select Everyone Full control- Allow and Everyone Full
> Control - Deny(It shouldnt allow you to actually :-)) )
> Deny overrides all other permissions.
>
> Cheers
> Vijay Rathee
> MCT
> >-----Original Message-----
> >I am just learning, and am confused on this issue. When
> assigning
> >permissions, there are the Allow and Deny checkboxes. I
> understand if
> >I choose deny that overrides everything, but is leaving
> both Allow and
> >Deny the same as applying Deny? If not, could someone
> please explain
> >the difference to me?
> >
> >Thanks, Kurt
> >.
> >
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: I E Hijack"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Permissions Question OOPS!"
- In reply to: Vj: "Permissions Question"
- Next in thread: Kurt: "Re: Permissions Question OOPS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|