Re: Shares vs. Rights
From: Oli Restorick [MVP] (oli_at_mvps.org)
Date: 10/13/03
- Previous message: Mike Burgess: "Re: netstat command"
- In reply to: Mark Bierman: "Shares vs. Rights"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:38:53 +0100
Hi Mark
Steven has given you the correct answer in another post.
I just wanted to point out that when you say "rights", we know what you
mean, but that word has a specific meaning in Windows NT operating systems
which isn't anything to do with file permissions.
Regards
Oli
"Mark Bierman" <mark@njycamps.org> wrote in message
news:OElJZrYkDHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Can someone please tell me which superceedes which...
>
> The rights that I give out when I create a shared drive vs. the rights
that
> I give out within the directory structure of that shared drive. Who wins?
>
> e.g. I create a new shared drive when Domain Users have Change & Read
right.
> Then within that shared drive, I give Domain Users read only rights to a
> specific directory.
>
> Will the domain users be able to change a file in that directory because
of
> the shared drive rights, or did I just limit it by the specific rights
> within the directory?
>
> THANKS!
>
> MB
>
>
- Previous message: Mike Burgess: "Re: netstat command"
- In reply to: Mark Bierman: "Shares vs. Rights"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|