Re: security template file import
From: Graham Turner (gturner_at_ipcomputers.demon.co.uk)
Date: 09/28/03
- Next message: S. Pidgorny
: "Re: Many to One mappings in Windows HOSTS file" - Previous message: sim: "How to block telnet port ?"
- In reply to: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Next in thread: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Reply: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:12:48 +0100
Nick, one final and very specific issue on security / GPO.
the observed behaviour when using an imported security template is that we
are observing truncation in the legal caption text.
the admins are able to set it ok using a GPO linked to a workstations
container for all the desktops but for the DC's we are using an imported
security template.
are there any "known issues" in this respect. ??
GT
"Nick Finco [MSFT]" <nfinco@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:#3e78d4gDHA.696@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "Graham Turner" <gturner@ipcomputers.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:%23Ay5DnpgDHA.2344@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Nick, thanks for your time on this as I think i have pretty much got
there
> !
>
> Glad to hear it. :)
>
> > the issue with the non-production server i established was i think
> > attributable to a "runaway" folder on the DC - i was noticing 100's of
> *.inf
> > / *.dom files which was getting longer with every security policy
> refresh -
> > in c:\winnt\security\templates\policies
>
> If you don't have 100s of GPOs with security policy affecting this client
> that shouldn't happen. There should only be one template per GPO in that
> folder. There was an issue at one point where those files couldn't be
> deleted because of a virus scanner. When policy propagated it would just
> keep incrementing the number and adding to the number of files there.
>
> > QU - given that as a general note the GPO editors are at best clumsy ( i
> > know this is improved by GPMC) but is manual edit of the gpttmpl.inf in
> the
> > GPO folder structure a supported operation;
>
> It's not supported. Basically, what the UI can generate in a security
> template is supported. If you can generate it from the UI, feel free to
> type it into the template. Some settings are tricky to get right though
> when you are editing by hand. And as you pointed out the UI will
increment
> the version number for the GPO which is very important so clients know
that
> the policy changed and will update their settings sooner. By default,
they
> will force a propagation every 16 hours though so the settings will take
> effect eventually.
>
> > haven't yet worked out that the tmpgptfl.inf file plays on the client
side
> > c:\winnt\security\templates\polices plays - is this a temp file used in
> the
> > import of the values into secedit.sdb which presumably is the
> > "running-config" ?
>
> It's a temporary file used while copying the GPOs down to the client.
It's
> values aren't factored into the final merge of the security settings when
> they are applied to the system. secedit.sdb is basically a scratch pad in
> which to do the setting merge and a place to store local security policy
on
> Win2k.
>
> > duly noted on the priority of the GPO's and the naming of GPT*.inf
files -
> > how though does the scecli.dll know which one has the highest priority -
> it
> > would seem to need to be written as an attribute of the container to
which
> > they are linked ??
>
> The Group Policy infrastructure tells each extension the priority and
> location of each GPO when policy propagation is triggered. This is based
> upon what OU the policy is defined within and what the GPO priority is
> within that OU. When you use the UI, you can move GPOs up or down in the
> list. That changes them to a higher or lower priority respectively. As
for
> as OU priority, local policy always has the lowest priority, then domain
> level policy, and then drilling down through the OU structure to the
> computer's OU, each OU gets higher and higher in priority until the OU
that
> contains the computer has the highest priority. How was that for a
run-on?
> ;)
>
> > final point - THIS HAS BEEN A MOST HELPFUL INSTRUCTION FROM YOURSELF -
Ta
> > v.much ~!!!
>
> Yup, you're welcome. I'm glad that I could help you to better understand
> this process. :)
>
> N
>
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
>
- Next message: S. Pidgorny
: "Re: Many to One mappings in Windows HOSTS file" - Previous message: sim: "How to block telnet port ?"
- In reply to: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Next in thread: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Reply: Nick Finco [MSFT]: "Re: security template file import"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|