Win2k SP4

From: Indred Cold (indredcold_2spambuffer_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/29/03 

Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:40:25 -0700

Has anyone installed this patch yet. I'm still on SP2 because there was way
too many negatives I read on the various forums regarding SP3.

What I want to know is if SP4 is *just* as buggy and messes up your system
as badly as SP3 did.

Personal testimonies welcome.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Microsofts latest Security update M03-007
    ... >SP2 is the commonality I've seen as to why some systems have problems ... Everyone thus far who's installed the patch without ... Our outward-facing web servers don't have SP3, ... We don't normally apply every fix or service pack that comes along, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Do I Really Need SP3?
    ... the most recent patch requires ... either SP2 or SP3, with the latter eating up a lot more ... Can I make do with just SP2? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Win2k SP4
    ... Has anyone installed this patch yet. ... I'm still on SP2 because there was way ... too many negatives I read on the various forums regarding SP3. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Microsofts latest Security update M03-007
    ... SP2 is the commonality I've seen as to why some systems have problems ... Everyone thus far who's installed the patch without ... incident, like myself, has been using SP3, while those complainning are ... Uh, why don't you have SP3 on there, anyway? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Word 2003 SP3 fails to import EMF
    ... I did NOT try to rollback from SP3 to SP2 by copying DLLs manually. ... Instead we completely deinstalled MS-Office and re-installed with SP2. ... Then we tested the EMF capability. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.drawing.graphics)