Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights
From: Mitchell (mboyer_at_mti.com)
Date: 06/10/03
- Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Previous message: vishnu patankar [ms]: "Permissions to view Performance counters"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:35:14 -0700
Thanks... But I do not know where to add rights to a
domain user on a Win2k server. I only see the Local user
under Computer Management. There is no Users and Passwords
icon in the Control panel of a win2k server as there is in
a win2k workstation. Does it use the local profile for
these settings?
>-----Original Message-----
>> In Win2k server how do you add a domain user with
specific
>> rights to that local computer? I.e. I want to add a
domain
>> user that can login to the domain but have
administrative
>> access only to that local server.
>
>The concept of local groups applies to both servers and
workstations. The
>only difference is that there are no local groups on
domain controllers.
>Thus, if you want to grant a domain user admin rights to
a single, non-DC
>server, then you would add them to that server's local
admin group, in
>exactly the same way as you would with a workstation.
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Previous message: vishnu patankar [ms]: "Permissions to view Performance counters"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Win2K VS Win2K Server rights"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|