Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No
From: Michel Lapointe (m_at_m.com)
Date: 04/29/03
- Next message: Frank Pappajohn: "Dialup users can't access SOME resources"
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- In reply to: Peter Clark: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Next in thread: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:59:38 -0400
They just claim that the OS support a 128 bit encryption API, not that all
and every unsecure software that don't use the API will be secured.
If you have a Software that use the encryption API, yes it will be secure,
if not than... you know.
ML
"Peter Clark" <clark@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:024201c30e87$f54af510$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> somethings are secured and somethings are not - depending
> on the design/configuration.
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >
> >Even though Windows 2000 and Server OS's claim to be 128
> >bit security?
- Next message: Frank Pappajohn: "Dialup users can't access SOME resources"
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- In reply to: Peter Clark: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Next in thread: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]