Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No
From: Peter Clark (clark_at_hushmail.com)
Date: 04/29/03
- Next message: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Previous message: Alexey Makarov: "Import RSA keys for IPSec connection W2K-Red Hat Linux"
- In reply to: Infosec: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Next in thread: Michel Lapointe: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Reply: Michel Lapointe: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:45:59 -0700
somethings are secured and somethings are not - depending
on the design/configuration.
>-----Original Message-----
>
>Even though Windows 2000 and Server OS's claim to be 128
>bit security?
- Next message: Russ: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Previous message: Alexey Makarov: "Import RSA keys for IPSec connection W2K-Red Hat Linux"
- In reply to: Infosec: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Next in thread: Michel Lapointe: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Reply: Michel Lapointe: "Re: Packet/Email Encryption Yes or No"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
