Re: User Rights with Everyone
From: Daniel Billingsley (dbillingsley_at_NO.durcon.SPAAMM.com)
Date: 04/29/03
- Next message: Brad Pears: "XP local profile and Win2K domain security"
- Previous message: CT: ""SELF" Permissions question"
- In reply to: Mike: "User Rights with Everyone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:16:54 -0400
I think you're trying to make a lot more out of this than there really is.
The default permission is for everyone. If you want to reduce exposure (and
it's highly recommended) you replace as necessary. It's really just that
simple. What's there to document?
"Mike" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:05cd01c30e72$691ee980$2f01280a@phx.gbl...
>
> I though about this reason too but it kind of weird to
> leave other groups just in case someone as the idea to
> remove the Everyone group but can not figure out what
> groups to put as a replacement. Strange this is not
> documented in any reference that I have read so far.
>
> Michel T.
- Next message: Brad Pears: "XP local profile and Win2K domain security"
- Previous message: CT: ""SELF" Permissions question"
- In reply to: Mike: "User Rights with Everyone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|