Re: Name resolution Hacked
From: Pete Elliott [MSFT] (peterell@online.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/11/03
- Next message: Dmitry Kulshitsky: "Re: secure shell"
- Previous message: Ajay Prashar: "Events 529 680 681 - Concerned about security breach"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Name resolution Hacked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Pete Elliott [MSFT]" <peterell@online.microsoft.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:17:38 -0700
Windows not only uses the hosts file for name resolution, but also lmhosts.
Check to see if there is an entry in that file.
-- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm "Steven L Umbach" <sumbach@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:PCkla.353$ug7.158397@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com... > How are you sure that it is a host lookup?? It could be resolving a > netbios name possibly appending a dns suffix or working off of the dns > client cache. Couple ways to check. Next time you try it run ipconfig > /flushdns first. If it resolves use ipconfig /displaydns to see if it is > resolved there. If not check nbtstat -r, -n, -c for the name being resolved > via NBT. Or better yet capture the lookup by starting netmon just before you > do the name resolution request. --- Steve > > "cvazquez" <cvazquez@epi.com.mx> wrote in message > news:025a01c2ff96$e95fc460$a101280a@phx.gbl... > > I have a windows 2k server that resolves a name to IP > > statictly with out sending a DNS lookup. I check the hosts > > file and the entry is not there, where else can this be? > >
- Next message: Dmitry Kulshitsky: "Re: secure shell"
- Previous message: Ajay Prashar: "Events 529 680 681 - Concerned about security breach"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Name resolution Hacked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]