Re: <B>FIREWALLS RESEARCH</B>
From: Geoff B (email@example.com)
From: "Geoff B" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:20:59 -0500
You might be interested to know that VisNetic Firewall (which was titled
Ambra in the beta phase), was developed by some of the original developers
from Signal 9 (who developed conseal, as you pointed out). .
You can find more information on VisNetic Firewall here:
-- Thanks, Geoffrey Brown ________________________ Online Operations Manager Deerfield.com email@example.com http://www.deerfield.com "Peter Clark" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > i was (still am) a big fan of conseal, however signal9 > (themakers) were brought out by mcafee awhile back. a had a > look around and found another goodish firewall from > deerfield called umbra(?) - currently called visnetic - > check it out if you have the time (theres a full demo on > their site), i was impressed. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Hello everybody! > >I am researching what firewall is the best buy to run on > >Win 2000 server which is configured as a dynamic web > >server. Any products that someone is using and happy with? > >And inexpensive to? I am looking for reliable product > >with relatively simple interface. > >Product i consider: > >-MacAfee personal firewall - do not know how stable the > >application is > >-Norton Internet Security - will not run on server edition > >of windows2000 > >-ZoneAlarm - Is it really a joke full of bugs???? > > > >Any comments/suggestions are appreciated very much. > >Thanks! > > > >. > >